IBM QRadar SOAR vs. Swimlane

Full-code security orchestration automation and response (SOAR) tools like IBM QRadar SOAR, formerly Resilient, are complex to deploy and manage. Since IBM acquired Resilient, product innovation has dramatically slowed. These are just a few reasons why you should never settle for “good enough” security automation from IBM QRadar SOAR. Kee reading to learn more.

Request a Demo


Performance	Limited automation capacity restricts scale and performance	Executes 25 million actions per day
Implementation	Requires heavy developer resources to deploy	Professional implementation with first value in 2 weeks or less
Playbooks	Developer resources needed to build, test, and maintain	Low-code playbook building and visual applications for any use case
Case Management	Restricted	Highly customizable with 72+ record fields
Dashboards	Limited	Visual dashboards for any user or use case
Reporting	Limited	Flexible reports that can leverage AI summaries and translations
AI	None	Swimlane LLM, AI-driven case management, reporting, and playbook tools
Integrations	Vendor specific integrations	Infinite integrations are available on-demand
Customer Support	Lack of documentation and customer support	4.9-star services and support experience (Gartner Peer Insights)
Updates & Innovation	Low innovations and slow deployment cycles for new features	#1 in product strategy & rate of improvement (SoftwareReviews)
Multi-Tenancy	Not supported	Cloud-native multi-tenant architecture

It’s Time to Rethink Your Security Operations

There is no comparison between Swimlane and IBM QRadar SOAR. Watch this short video to learn more about what makes Swimlane Turbine the #1 customer-rated, most scalable, fast, and flexible security automation platform in the world.

You can’t use sub-playbooks easily, view of dependency of modules are not visible, application library is limited.
IBM QRadar SOAR Customer, Gartner Peer Insights