Torq vs. Swimlane Security Automation Comparison

Reasons why you should never settle for “good enough” security automation from Torq.


Implementation	Difficult to get started	Completed in 2 weeks or less
Scalability	Executes a small number of events per second	Executes over 25 million actions per day per customer
Performance	Limited scale can slow automation speed	Automates 10x faster than competitors
Case Management	Cannot edit preset fields	Highly customizable with 72+ record fields
Integrations	Limited to pre-built integrations with no SDK	Infinite integrations are available on-demand with SDK
Dashboards	Vendor defined only	Visual dashboards for any user or use case
Scheduled Reporting	Manual download only	Flexible and scheduled reports that can leverage AI summaries and translations
Playbooks	No playbook customization	Highly adaptable low-code playbooks
Deployment Models	SaaS	Cloud, on-premises, or air-gapped
Pricing & Packaging	Unexpected & hidden costs (deployment, features…)	Full featured with unlimited users & integrations

Reimagine Security Operations with Swimlane

There is no comparison between Swimlane and Torq. Watch this short video to learn more about what makes Swimlane Turbine the #1 customer-rated, most scalable, fast, and flexible security automation platform in the world.

The information about errors on the website does not always provide the solution, I have had to resort to consultations with external agents to solve problems within the platform, I think the support team should take more seriously the solutions for users.

Torq Customer, Gartner Peer Insights

Integration with security vendors could improve in breadth and service, with better integration we can have better command of threats and more robust security updates.
Torq Customer, Gartner Peer Insights